Autopilot tool leaves little work beyond tweaking masks and adjusting strength slidersĪvailable now for both Windows and macOS, Topaz Photo AI is priced at $199.Locates faces in your images and improves their visual quality.Upsamples low-res images to higher resolutions using AI algorithms.Corrects noise, blurring and lens distortions.Locates your subjects and identifies image quality defects automatically.Can function as a standalone app or a plugin for Photoshop and other apps.Outputs DNG Raws for continued processing or ready-to-use JPEGs, TIFFs or PNGs.Works with both Raw images and pre-rendered JPEGs.The underlying technologies come courtesy of Topaz's well-received DeNoise AI, Gigapixel AI and Sharpen AI applications. It does so thanks to a clever Autopilot function that analyzes your images, identifies their subjects and image quality shortcomings, then uses that information to apply intelligent corrections with as little user work involved as possible. Photo AI forgoes the complexity found in most photo editing apps, instead aiming to do the grunt work for you. But what if you have a batch of photos to process and just want good results with a minimum of fuss? That's where Topaz Labs' latest offering, Topaz Photo AI, comes in.
If you want the ability to fettle your artworks to perfection, applications like Adobe Photoshop and Lightroom, DxO Optics Pro, Capture One and others give you access to a vast selection of controls with which to tweak to your heart's content. I tried to upload all pictures to another service, but this website says, that I can not add more than one link, as a new user, so please copy the other three in your browser.Topaz Photo AI's user interface is extremely clean, straightforward and approachable, with just a handful of controls per tool and most of the work done automatically by AI algorithms. UPDATE: Sorry, something went wrong with my attached pictures. Here two more files of the same size as the Topaz preview, in case someone want’s to use it as a layer. I’m looking for the best solution, but right now I would probably use DeepPrime (because of artifacts).
#Topaz photo ai angebot full#
I have a hard drive full of pictures to process (some have higher ISO). I’m no expert, but this was only one picture I looked at. Light seems more smooth in DeepPrime as well. This seems more “removed” in XD, which appears more clear, but also produces some strange artifacts. XD looks more “crisp”, “sharp” and seems to provide a little bit more detail/structure, but it comes at a price. When it comes to DeepPrime vs DeepPrime XD I’m skeptical. When I look at the PL6 result, there is no contest.
The writing is soft and what happened to the green reflections on the car?. There also is a yellow line at the bottom of the window. The marble wall below the green window lost almost all detail. If the Topaz preview represents a similar end result, then I’m pretty much shocked with the way it looks. I will also upload two more files, so you can maybe view them as layers for better comparison. I then tried PL6 with everything but NR unchecked and this is the comparison result: I applied a value of “1” (strength) for NR, “14” (detail) and nothing else. I took the first best RAW picture from my hard drive (ISO 1250, shot with Sony A7c). Unless a saved file in Topaz has much better quality, then a screenshot should do it.
#Topaz photo ai angebot trial#
I only have trial versions of both programs, that’s why I compare the result from the preview window in Topaz. I was a little bit intrigued by the Topaz comparison video someone posted here and decided to do my own test when PL6 came out.
0 kommentar(er)
